Expunction
From the Law Office of Alison Grinter in Dallas, Texas
Contents |
What is Expunction?
Expunction is a way to clean up a person's criminal record. An arrest that has been expunged is deleted completely. The person can deny ever having been arrested, and if asked about it under oath, need only say "the matter has been expunged." Expunction is definitely the best option for repairing someone's criminal record, but very few people are elligible to receive an expunction.
Who can Get an Expunction?
You can only get an expunction if your case was dismissed, no-billed, never filed, quashed, deferred adjudication (Class C Misdemeanor only), acquitted, pardoned, or was charged against you only as a result of identity fraud (someone else was arrested under your name), or while you were a minor (Class C Misdemeanor only). But there are other conditions as well.
| Type of Case | Disposition of the case: | AND: |
| Class C Misdemeanor | Deferred Adjudication | Successful completion of the deferral period |
| Misdemeanor | No longer pending, no conviction, no Deferred Adjudication, no Probation (case was dismissed, quashed, or never filed) |
|
| Felony | No indictment has been presented against the defendant for any offense arising out of the arrest incident. |
|
| Felony | Indictment was dismissed or quashed |
|
| Felony or Misdemeanor |
| No additional requirements |
| Felony or Misdemeanor | Defendant is granted a Pardon | No additional requirements |
| Felony or Misdemeanor | | The only reason the defendant's name and identifying information is associated with this offense is that another person was arrested under the defendant's name. |
| Conviction |
| |
| Failure to Attend School | Conviction |
|
What Has to be Done?
A petition for expunction must be filed in the county of the arrest, or in the municipal or justice of the peace court for Class C Misdemeanor offenses. The prosecutor's office will decide whether it wants to oppose the petition, and will file a response with the court. A hearing will be set, and both parties will be heard, and the judge will decide whether the defendant is entitled to an expunction. If the judge grants the expunction, she will sign an order for expunction and it will be sent to all of the police and law enforcement agencies that have records of the case, ordering them to destroy and/or send the records to the defendant. 30 days after the order is signed, it is final, and people or entities violating the order are subject to contempt of court for revealing any information contained in the records.
Statute
Art. 55.01. RIGHT TO EXPUNCTION.
(a) A person who has been placed under a custodial or noncustodial arrest for commission of either a felony or misdemeanor is entitled to have all records and files relating to the arrest expunged if:
(1) the person is tried for the offense for which the person was arrested and is:
(A) acquitted by the trial court, except as provided by Subsection (c) of this section; or
(B) convicted and subsequently pardoned; or
(2) each of the following conditions exist:
(A) an indictment or information charging the person with commission of a felony has not been presented against the person for an offense arising out of the transaction for which the person was arrested or, if an indictment or information charging the person with commission of a felony was presented, the indictment or information has been dismissed or quashed, and:
(i) the limitations period expired before the date on which a petition for expunction was filed under Article 55.02; or
(ii) the court finds that the indictment or information was dismissed or quashed because the presentment had been made because of mistake, false information, or other similar reason indicating absence of probable cause at the time of the dismissal to believe the person committed the offense or because it was void;
(B) the person has been released and the charge, if any, has not resulted in a final conviction and is no longer pending and there was no court ordered community supervision under Article 42.12 for any offense other than a Class C misdemeanor; and
(C) the person has not been convicted of a felony in the five years preceding the date of the arrest.
(a-1) Notwithstanding Subsection (a)(2)(C), a person's conviction of a felony in the five years preceding the date of the arrest does not affect the person's entitlement to expunction for purposes of an ex parte petition filed on behalf of the person by the director of the Department of Public Safety under Section 2(e), Article 55.02.
(b) Except as provided by Subsection (c) of this section, a district court may expunge all records and files relating to the arrest of a person who has been arrested for commission of a felony or misdemeanor under the procedure established under Article 55.02 of this code if the person is:
(1) tried for the offense for which the person was arrested;
(2) convicted of the offense; and
(3) acquitted by the court of criminal appeals.
(c) A court may not order the expunction of records and files relating to an arrest for an offense for which a person is subsequently acquitted, whether by the trial court or the court of criminal appeals, if the offense for which the person was acquitted arose out of a criminal episode, as defined by Section 3.01, Penal Code, and the person was convicted of or remains subject to prosecution for at least one other offense occurring during the criminal episode.
(d) A person is entitled to have any information that identifies the person, including the person's name, address, date of birth, driver's license number, and social security number, contained in records and files relating to the arrest of another person expunged if:
(1) the information identifying the person asserting the entitlement to expunction was falsely given by the person arrested as the arrested person's identifying information without the consent of the person asserting the entitlement; and
(2) the only reason for the information identifying the person asserting the entitlement being contained in the arrest records and files of the person arrested is that the information was falsely given by the person arrested as the arrested person's identifying information.
Added by Acts 1977, 65th Leg., p. 1880, ch. 747, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 29, 1977.
Amended by Acts 1979, 66th Leg., p. 1333, ch. 604, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 27, 1979; Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 803, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989; Subsec. (2) amended by Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 14, Sec. 284(53), eff. Sept. 1, 1991. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 7.02(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1993; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1236, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 30, 1999; Subsec. (a) amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1021, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Subsec. (d) added by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 945, Sec. 1, eff. June 14, 2001; Subsec. (a) amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1236, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 1309, Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2005.
Notes
Discuss this article with the Law Office of Alison Grinter
BlogMarks
del.icio.us
digg
Fark
Furl
Newsvine
reddit
Segnalo
Simpy
Slashdot
smarking
Spurl
Wists
